c++ - CMake/Ninja attempting to compile deleted `.cpp` file -


i've found when delete cpp files project using cmake , ninja, can't compile without first deleting build directory , starting scratch. cmake and/or ninja apparently squirrels away number of references cpp files compiles, deleting cmake cache before re-running cmake doesn't remove references.

is known issue? there solution? i've run rm $(grep -r <filename> <builddir>), that's terrible kludge.

edit: appears mistaken, have not been able duplicate problem. manually re-running cmake appears always generate correct list of .cpp files, using glob generate lists of sources.

turning comments answer

collecting source files file(glob ...)

yes, cmake won't know new or deleted source files when collecting source files file(glob ...) command. known restriction cmake. i've changed cmake project(s) list source files individually because of this. out of convenience i'm still collecting header files file(glob ...) command.

quoting cmake's file() command documentation:

we not recommend using glob collect list of source files source tree. if no cmakelists.txt file changes when source added or removed generated build system cannot know when ask cmake regenerate.

deleting cmakecache.txt retrigger configuration

just deleting cmakecache.txt may not enough retrigger cmake configuration. issue 0014820: warn users removing cmakecache.txt claims need delete cmakefiles directories.

from experience reliable way retrigger cmake configuration touch 1 of projects cmakelists.txt files.

note: ninja cmake adds rebuild_cache target conveniently running cmake project again.

retrigger after updates source control

just 1 thought: if deletion of source files happens because removed source control there maybe workaround still allows use file(glob ...) on source files.

e.g. if use git add following main cmakelists.txt:

configure_file(${cmake_source_dir}/.git/index ${project_binary_dir}/git_index.tmp)

disadvantage: retrigger configuration each git operation (update, commit, ...).

some references:


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

powershell Start-Process exit code -1073741502 when used with Credential from a windows service environment -

i'm running strange behavior powershell start-process call. here call: $process = start-process ` "c:\somepath\mybinary.exe" ` -passthru ` -credential $defaultcredential ` -wait ` -workingdirectory "c:\somepath" ` -loaduserprofile if ($process.exitcode -ne 0) { #do } this call return exit code - 1073741502 . after quick search, exit code seems related generic error when program not load required dll (aka. status_dll_init_failed ). when run without -credential $credential program runs correctly. in order isolate problem, manually launched some.exe in prompt target credential , runs smoothly. so problem seems come way start-process cmdlet launch process. i found potential solutions problem tried apply no luck : link , link . would have idea of what's going on here ? edit 1: run proc mon monitoring program activities when launched directly or via powershell script. problem seems occur when loading kernelbase
Read more

twig - Using Twigbridge in a Laravel 5.1 Package -

i'm trying create laravel 5.1 package uses twigbridge instead of .php views. can normal .php views display fine, when try make use of .twig templates i'm met error. possible use twigbridge templates when creating views laravel package or pretty stuck blade , php ? edit 1: loading twig template without extending works. it's when start using {% extends 'file' %} error comes out. i error error loading /virtual/laravel/packages/username/mypackage/src/views/sample.twig: template "templates.master" not defined () in "/virtual/laravel/packages/username/mypackage/src/views/sample.twig" @ line 1. my folders username |_ mypackage |_ src |_ controllers - samplecontroller.php |_ views |_ templates - master.twig - sample.twig twig template sample.twig {% extends 'templates.master' %} {% block content %} {{ parent()
Read more

c# - LINQ join Entities from HashSet's, Join vs Dictionary vs HashSet performance -

i have hashset's each stores t, have written test application compares different relation algorithms can think of, i'm not pleased results getting. does there exist more efficient ways of achieving object relations, once testing? using system; using system.collections.generic; using system.linq; using system.text; using system.threading.tasks; using system.diagnostics; namespace linqtests { class program { static void main(string[] args) { hashset<user> usertable = new hashset<user>(); hashset<userproperty> userpropertytable = new hashset<userproperty>(); #region lets create dummy data. console.writeline("please wait while creating dummy data, can take while..."); console.writeline(""); int rows = 1000000; for(int x = 0; x < rows; x++) { random rnd = new random(); // ad
Read more